🚀 Register for our upcoming free Capital Raising workshop 👉 Register
Director misconduct can create serious legal, financial, and reputational risks for startups and companies. Misuse of company funds, conflicts of interest, or breaches of duties can quickly lead to a director dispute if the issue is not handled early.
This guide gives founders, boards, and shareholders in Australia a clear and practical roadmap on how to detect problems, deal with complex situations, understand legal options, manage disputes, and prevent issues from happening again.
Director misconduct occurs when a director acts outside the legal rules set out in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). In particular, directors must act in good faith, exercise care and diligence, avoid conflicts of interest, and not misuse their position or company information.
Misconduct can be either deliberate or accidental. However, even well-meaning directors can trigger a director dispute if, for example, they make decisions without proper governance, fail to disclose conflicts, or act without authority.
For instance, if a founder-director signs a contract with a supplier they personally own without informing the board, this can lead to a director dispute, even if the deal ultimately benefits the company. Therefore, transparency and adherence to governance rules are essential to prevent such conflicts.
Common Complex Scenarios of Director Misconduct
Director misconduct can present in multiple ways, often more sophisticated than simple disagreements. Common complex scenarios include:
Misconduct isn’t always obvious. Patterns of behaviour, gaps in reporting, or deviations from governance processes are often the first warning signs.
Early detection is critical, particularly for complex misconduct that may involve hidden transactions or sophisticated arrangements. Founders and boards should adopt an investigative mindset to gather facts and evidence methodically.
A methodical approach ensures the company can respond effectively and protect its position if legal or formal steps become necessary.
Before confronting a director, assess the potential impact. Consider:
Complex misconduct cases often require prioritising issues using risk mapping ranking problems by financial, legal, and reputational consequences to determine the order of action.
Once evidence is collected and risks assessed, raise the matter formally in a board meeting. Discussions should remain professional and focused on the company’s interests rather than personal grievances. Immediate protective measures may include restricting the director’s access to funds, systems, or sensitive information.
Formalising the process ensures transparency and demonstrates that the board acted diligently and responsibly.
Complex misconduct often requires impartial review. Options include:
An independent investigation adds credibility, prevents bias claims, and often uncovers deeper issues not visible to the board. This approach can guide a resolution that is fair, defensible, and legally compliant.
Where misconduct is severe or persistent, formal legal measures may be necessary:
In complex cases, multiple legal avenues may be pursued simultaneously. For example, a director diverting clients and IP to a competitor may require injunctions, civil claims for losses, and reporting to ASIC to protect the company.
☑ Obtain legal advice before acting to ensure compliance
☑ Maintain clear communication with shareholders and investors
While addressing misconduct, the company should take steps to minimise ongoing risk:
Containing risk first ensures that corrective action can proceed without further damage.
Once the immediate issue is addressed, implement measures to prevent future misconduct:
Let’s say a Sydney-based tech startup discovered that a director had diverted R&D intellectual property to a personal consultancy while also signing contracts without board approval. The company:
This structured approach prevented litigation, mitigated reputational risk, and reassured investors.
At Allied Legal, we help Australian startups navigate complex director disputes and misconduct issues:
Our consultative approach equips founders and boards with practical strategies to detect, resolve, and prevent misconduct, safeguarding both the business and relationships.
